The law provides that pretrial detention should only be applied, so exceptional, who supposedly could escape justice (read out of the country), or for serious crimes, and none of the two is the case. Actually no conclusions have been drawn Interim Office of the Prosecutor, so that is not yet defined the procedural object. A context to declare authoritatively still
is not known why Darsi prisoner, even though the instruction injunction decree for crimes of receiving and attack a neighbor, who allegedly sent threatening phrases.

The family has sent complaints to the Deputy Attorney General of the Republic, and the defense has submitted three applications for change of measure. The uncertainty overwhelms family and friends, given the dangerous environment surrounding the activist doctor.

The defense, in a last request for a change of measure (the fourth),
plotted accurately points out that the current state of immobility in
is the process that breaks the legal terms to the detriment
of the essential guarantees of the accused:

A. The preparatory phase ended in September last year, more than six months. Since then the case has shifted from the prosecution October 10th Municipal Provincial Court, and thence to the Attorney General but so far none has been adopted variants under Article 261 or 262 of the Act Criminal Procedure: removal, dismissal or presentation to Court, after making tentative conclusions. The terms to apply both rules of law are overdue. It has not happened so far anything new in the process. A breakdown of legal terms violates the principle of legality.

B. On another subject, was presented on 29 October 2009, at the Provincial Prosecutor’s Office a letter of request for change of measure precaution, and it was not until 7 December of that year, 39 days later reported that the order refusing “signed on 13 November 2009 “, when I was in regular telephone contact with the prosecution, and had not yet declared their position. However, Article 251 of procedural law establishes maximum for 5 days
resolve this matter.

C. Instruction 133-88, the Governing Council of the Supreme Court People, places on the need to prioritize the processes accused in custody, reaffirming the principle of speed or “prompt justice” without doubt one of the essential guarantees of process. Unfortunately in this case was not the case.

“Darsi Ferrer is being held for six months (plus two in instruction, 8 months in total), without having defined its position, results based on grounds wholly unnecessary to continue keeping them in prison, while the process continues to dilate unjustified, “concluded the defense. It’s time for prosecutors and judges resign from the accomplice and handling aware of the responsibility for his actions, a responsibility that involving journalists in the official program Mesa Redonda, and other Yeomen of the paroxysm Castro.

Possibly Related Articles:

• Or American judicial system do terrorism case
  Boots the trial for the attack in Detroit Abdulmutallab Nigerian pleads not guilty in his first appearance - Prosecutors accused expected to negotiat...
• Solutions for companies in crisis. We answer the questions of the new law
  The entry into force of the new Insolvency Act on 1 September 2004, has been a change in the treatment of insolvencies in Spain. Desaparece suspension...
• Introduction to Economic Analysis of Law (AED) Part II
  the main contributions that the AED making the economy were made by the so-called institutional economics. The main theorists of the discipline in its...
• Industrial property: in effect the decree simplifying procedures
  It 'came into force on 10 March 2010 Decree of the Ministry of Economic Development contains the Regulations for implementation of the Code of Industr...
• RU486: ignore the law 194
  Statements of Gasparri, Cota, Zaia and Polverini deeply embitter. If the intention of the center is really a drug to block important scientific and ...